Feature Radar Chart
Compare products across different features (0–10 scale)
Why is Zendure SolarFlow Hyper 2000 better than Anker Solix C300 ?
Higher capacity: 661Wh more
Higher AC output: 900W more
Higher solar input: 1700W more
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Anker Solix C300 vs Zendure SolarFlow Hyper 2000
Feature | Anker Solix C300 | Zendure SolarFlow Hyper 2000 |
|---|---|---|
240 $ | 1198 $ BEST | |
299 Wh | 960 Wh BEST | |
300 W | 1200 W BEST | |
120 W | N/A | |
2 | N/A | |
1 | N/A | |
Yes | No | |
Yes | No | |
No | No | |
100 W | 1800 W BEST | |
LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 | |
2.5 hrs | N/A | |
More Details | View on Anker Solix | View on Zendure |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Anker Solix C300 and Zendure SolarFlow Hyper 2000 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Popular Solar Power Comparisons
Compare Anker Solix C300 or Zendure SolarFlow Hyper 2000 with other top power stations for reliable off-grid energy storage.
